Listen to this study
Authorship, date, and setting
The opening attributes the letter to Simon Peter (1:1); the speaker also presents himself as a witness of the transfiguration (1:16–18) and expects his own death (1:14). Authorship is disputed: ancient tradition and some interpreters defend Peter, while many scholars place the writing after his lifetime, between the late first and early second centuries. The mention of Paul's letters in 3:15–16 and the parallels with Jude are among the contested evidence; no city of destination is named.
Structure of the three chapters
Chapter 1 calls readers to add virtues to faith and recalls the mountain experience and prophetic word. Chapter 2 denounces teachers who exploit the community and invokes examples of judgment. Chapter 3 answers those who mock the promise of Christ's coming and ends with an appeal to vigilance.
Themes and key passages
The sequence of faith, knowledge, self-control, and love in 1:5–7 ties conviction to conduct. In 2:1–3 the problem of false teachers includes exploitation through deceptive words. The argument in 3:8–9 distinguishes human perceptions of time from divine patience; 3:13 expresses hope for new heavens and a new earth associated with righteousness.
Summary by parts
1: The writer calls for moral growth, speaks of his approaching departure, and presents the transfiguration as testimony to Jesus' majesty.
2: The attack on false teachers moves through the angels, the flood, and Sodom; Lot's rescue contrasts with the fate of the unjust.
3: Scoffers ask why the promise is delayed. The writer answers by recalling creation and the flood, describes the day of the Lord, and urges steadiness against distorted readings of Paul's letters.
Reception, canon, and manuscripts
2 Peter now belongs to the New Testament, but its ancient recognition was more contested than that of 1 Peter. Histories of the canon record doubts about the letter before its broad acceptance. Reception must be distinguished from the historical question of its author; the identification in the greeting is the text's own claim, not a resolution of the debate.
Sources
- Catholic Encyclopedia, Epistles of Saint Peter (1911).
- Catholic Encyclopedia, Canon of the New Testament (1908).
- ESV Global Study Bible, Introduction to 2 Peter (2012).